Movie Review: Mary (2024 film about Jesus's mother)
- Elaine R Kelly

- Dec 21, 2024
- 10 min read
Updated: Sep 17
This 2024 film retells the story of Mary, the mother of Jesus, in a new way. I was looking forward to a movie set in biblical times showing the female point of view. However, this film seems to sacrifice biblical truth to achieve danger and drama.
Released: December 2024
Executive Producer: Joel Osteen
Producers: Mary Aloe, Gillian Hormel, Hannah Leader
Production companies: Aloe Entertainment; Luna Film
Music by: Timothy Williams
Director: D. J. Caruso
Starring: Noa Cohen (Mary), Ido Tako (Joseph), Anthony Hopkins (Herod the Great)
Distributed by: Netflix
Genre: Biblical Fiction; Historical fiction, Christian history
Pros:
beautiful scenery and music
retells the birth of Jesus from his mother's point of view
Mary gains agency as she comes of age, saying "let it be me" to the conception and then protecting baby Jesus
Concluding line: "Love will cost you dearly, it will pierce your heart, but in the end, love will save the world."
Cons:
excessive violence
Location of events is changed, with Mary growing up in Jerusalem, not Nazareth
Mary is confused and has doubts as her parents give her for life to the Temple and then give her to Joseph.
Angel Gabriel's message to Mary is threatening and foreboding, complete with thunderstorms, as opposed to a promise of good news
Joseph is not informed of events by an angel
Sequence of events is out of order, making the slaughtering of innocents earlier, and delaying the dedication at the temple until after Herod's soldiers are killing babies.
Mary, Joseph, and Jesus are at risk without protection from God

Mary's Coming of Age
The IMDb describes this movie as a timeless coming-of-age story where Mary is shunned and forced to flee.
As a writer of novels set in biblical times highlighting the equal role of women in the stories of Jesus, I was interested to see Mary's development from girl to woman and mother. This story shows Mary growing mature, but mostly shows how others stop oppressing her.
Mary begins as a happy, laughing child. Her parents give her to the Temple as a pawn in their bargain with God. The Temple uses her for manual labour, regulates her schedule, and disciplines her for dallying in the gardens. Her parents then tell her to break the vow to the church because the angel has indicated Joseph should marry her. The angel Gabriel tells her God has chosen her. She is afraid and confused. Her first act of personal agency is when she agrees, saying "Let it be me".
Gender Equality
Unfortunately, the makers of this film confuse Mary becoming equal and having agency over her own life with her wanting to rule over men. The movie shows Mary ruling over her husband, telling him the name of the child and that they must dedicate Jesus at the Temple. In addition, Anne is portrayed as manipulative, holding secrets from her husband, and ruling over her husband. The film seems to confuse gender equality with making women rulers. A hierarchy with women ruling would be equally as harmful as a hierarchy with men ruling. I fight for gender equality, raising women to have the same respect and freedoms as men, cooperating together.
The biblical account shows Mary and Joseph mutually following God's guidance. They are each visited by an angel, each wants the baby to be named Jesus, and each wants to obey the law to dedicate newborns at the Temple eight days after birth. Becoming a mature woman does not mean becoming a ruler. The Bible provides a model of equality and mutuality.
Biblical Account
When writing a fiction set in biblical times, I rely on the Bible as my first source for timelines, plot points, and characterization. I use fiction to complete backstories and character development. However, this film skips facts revealed in the Bible and replaces them with scenes that are completely fiction, theologically misleading, or superfluously violent. The film veers from the biblical account in several ways:
Mary and her parents, "Joachim of Nazareth", live on a farm on a hill very close to the Jerusalem Temple (instead of in Nazareth).
The angel appears to Mary and announces the coming pregnancy in the Temple of Jerusalem (not in Nazareth)
The angel's announcement is foreboding and Mary reacts in obedience and anxiety (the biblical announcement is good news and Mary reacts with a prophetic song of praise)
Joseph does not know the baby is from God or should be named Jesus; he gains this information from Mary (the Bible says an angel informs Joseph).
The sequence of events is rearranged so that Herod's slaughtering of the innocents puts Mary, Joseph, and baby Jesus at risk (the Bible shows that God warns them in advance and protects them).
Catholic Elements
Where the Bible does not provide information, it is reasonable to look to other historical sources. Since the Bible does not detail Mary's parents or childhood, I had no problem with taking advantage of the Catholic tradition that names Anne and Joachim as Mary's parents. I had been unaware of the Catholic teaching that her parents gave Mary to the Temple at a young age. It is lovely to imagine that Mary was acquainted with the prophet Anna, who had lived in the Temple for decades and blessed the baby Jesus.
However, Catholics criticized the film as not showing Catholic teachings including Mary's immaculate conception and Mary's lack of pain in giving birth to the Holy Child. It seems the filmmakers relied more on the non-biblical text "Protovangelium of James" than on the biblical account.
Truth vs Thriller
Netflix describes the film as "A miraculous conception. A merciless king. A murderous pursuit." The film seems to sacrifice an element of God's providence, guidance, and protection in order to present a thriller-style movie. When the angel tells Mary she will have a child, instead of Mary singing praises to God about the coming Messiah, she looks worried and afraid, thunder rolls, and music swells. The angel does not relieve her fears.
Instead of God protecting Mary, a demon attacks her in the Temple (the angel Gabriel saves her) and on the street (Joseph saves her). While the Bible shows God and his angels warning Joseph and Mary to leave Bethlehem before Herod's slaughter of the innocents, the film leaves them without God's warning, vulnerable to Herod's men. The film rearranges the sequence of events in order to put Mary, Joseph, and baby Jesus in mortal danger. This sacrifice of theological accuracy reminds me of the Left Behind series, which promotes an inaccurate view of the end times in order to facilitate a thriller-style action film series.
Spoilers Ahead:
Here is my chart contrasting the sequence of events in the film vs the biblical narrative.
Elaine Ricker Kelly Author is empowering women with historical fiction about women in the Bible and early church and Christian blogs about women in leadership, church history and doctrine. Her books include:
Forgotten Followers from Broken to Bold, Book 1 (2022)
The Sword A Fun Way to Engage in Healthy Debate on What the Bible Says About a Woman's Role (2023)
Because She Was Called: from Broken to Bold, Book 2, A Novel of the Early Church, imagines Mary Magdalene's trip to testify before the emperor (2024)
Walk with Mara on Her Healing Journey: 21 Steps to Emotional Resilience (2024)



Comments