• Elaine Kelly

Were Women at the Last Supper?

Back in 2005 the French fashion house Marithé and François Gribaud used a variation on DaVinci's Last Supper in an ad campaign. It was banned in Milan. In the same way, the church and state together banned images of women as disciples and women at the last supper when DaVinci first painted his masterpiece.

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/feb/04/media.arts


Leonardo Davinci painted his Last Supper between 1495 and 1498 as a fresco on a wall at a men’s convent at Santa Maria delle Grazie in Milan, Italy. It was commissioned by Ludovico Sforza, the Duke of Milan and DaVinci’s employer for nearly 18 years. Having men in the painting would be suitable to the viewers: the male brethren of the convent. This art and simple décor it shows assisted in the brothers’ meditation and worship.


To have any women in the painting would have offended DaVinci’s employer and the Roman Catholic Pope. At the time of the painting, it was heresy for women to be portrayed in art as disciples, and DaVinci did not put Mary Magdalene in his painting. Each of the twelve is identifiable in DaVinci's painting. The disciple John, at Jesus's right hand, had to be depicted as young with no beard so that viewers of the time would recognize him. Peter is whispering to John. Judas, the betrayer, is holding a pouch of coins and reaching for a piece of bread, which Jesus gives him just before telling Judas to go and do what he must. While I was bothered that his skin appears darker than any of the others, apologists explain he is in a shadow and positioned lower than the others. James the Great is sitting on Jesus's left hand, so the brothers got their request to sit at his right and left in this picture. But to the heart of the matter: if DaVinci painted in a way that was contrary to the church orthodoxy, he could be arrested. The Inquisition was active in France, Spain, and Italy, killing anyone who disagreed with the church.

In 1521, the theologians of the Sorbonne had formally condemned images of Mary Magdalene as a disciple and said it was heresy to portray her as anyone other than the repentant, sinful woman of Luke 7. DaVinci’s contemporary, Galileo, was sentenced to life imprisonment by the Roman Catholic Church in 1633 for claiming the Earth orbits the Sun. This was heresy since the idea contradicted the orthodox interpretation that Scripture’s indicated the Earth was fixed and central. Portraying a woman in DaVinci’s painting would have risked being accused of heresy for going against church orthodoxy and tradition by including women at the last supper.


Davinci’s painting does counter orthodoxy by painting Jesus without a halo, indicating that Jesus and his disciples were simple and mortal. DaVinci’s painting was part of the Catholic counter-reformation movement to remove all distractions, including women, designing the painting to encourage meditation and devotion to Christ. It powerfully captures the emotions and reactions of the evening and uses scientific lines of perspective but is a product of the restrictions of the time.


Another painting of the last supper was done in 1560 by Spanish painter Juan de Juanes and it shows Jesus and the disciples with halos as was typical of the era. He added in front show the bowl and pitcher to remind us of the washing of the feet.


There were very few women artists in the Renaissance era, and the women artists were also restricted to portray church orthodoxy. In 1568, Plautilla Nelli, a nun in Florence, painted the Last Supper. Her painting depicts Jesus and twelve men but is unique because women were banned from studying anatomy or science. Nelli’s status as a nun freed her from domestic duties and allowed her to pursue art when women were largely banned from the profession. Her painting of the Last Supper hung in the dining hall of her women’s convent until the early 19th century then warehoused until 1939 when it was restored.


Restrictions on the depiction of women in art, and religious art in particular, lasted for centuries. In contrast to the simple, meditative portrayal by DaVinci, in 1573, Paolo Veronese painted the Last supper being enjoyed in the midst of all of life’s distractions, showing real life and the commercial and cross-cultural activity of Venice at the time. The Inquisition accused Veronese of heresy, a capital offence. The artist was acquitted on the condition that he re-name it Feast in the House of Levi. A brief video of his painting is here.





In Peru, the Spanish art school only permitted paintings related to Christianity or Europe, but many Peruvian artists found ways to slip Incan images into their paintings. A painting in Cusco, Peru, crosses cultural lines in its portrayal of the last supper. Marcos Zapata painted it in 1753 and portrays Jesus and the twelve disciples gathered to dine on a guinea pig, a staple of Incan diets. The artist also used the corn maize drink chicha instead of wine. The face of Judas the betrayer resembles conquistador Francisco Pizarro, who killed the Inca King. While this hidden meaning may criticize the Spanish conquistadors, they did not arrest the artist, possibly because he was very prolific or because his art brought the Incans to the Catholic church.

Painting, Cuzco Cathedral, photo courtesy of flickr creative commons: flickr.com/photos/mdu2boy/2360002476/


The church of the Santa Maria la Mayor in Ronda, Spain features all women in blue at the Last Supper. It dates to 1485, being converted from a mosque by the Catholic monarchs.

It is an older painting depicting women at the last supper but I can find very little information on it.





While acknowledging DaVinci’s work as a masterpiece fulfilling its purpose of encouraging the male brethren of the convent to meditate and to see Jesus and his disciples as human, Polish artist Bohdan Piasecki wanted to address some of the historical inaccuracies in DaVinci’s work. In his 1998 painting, Bohdan Piasecki portrays the last supper as a family event, because Passover is a family celebration, teaching children about their history, and inviting guests. His painting adds seven women and two children to the commonly depicted gathering of twelve, dressing all 22 figures in Palestinian clothing.

- DaVinci shows all Italian males dressed in renaissance attire in a Florentine palace, rather than a Jewish celebration of Passover in Palestine

- Davinci shows figures seated at the table on benches eating fish and leavened bread, not Jesus and disciples reclining on couches eating lamb and unleavened bread

- Davinci shows daylight, while event occurred at night

- Davinci shows only 12 disciples, while Passover Meals include the whole family, even travellers and guests; Passover tradition requires the youngest present to ask questions; it was a family celebration

Prints of Bohdan Piasecki's painting are available here.



Just as DaVinci’s painting encouraged the monks at their convent to meditate on Christ, other portrayals are needed to encourage women and minorities to meditate on Christ and the new life he brings to all people. In her 1988 painting entitled ‘the First Supper', Australian artist Susan Dorothea White shows aboriginals and women at the last supper. She painted it to challenge the acceptance of all men with similar features and instead presents women and foods from different parts of the world.


A Female last supper was done recently showing twelve women with Jesus, advocating gender equality and social change relating to women and women’s rights




A 2015 painting entitled the Ladies Supper was done by James Cochran, aka Jimmy C, for the Bird in Hand winery in Adelaide, Australia. It shows thirteen figures, all women, a collection of friends and family from the winery. The painting explores women's roles with images of love, spirituality, and creation.




Millie Samuelson has authored Women of the Last Supper: We Were There Too. She suggests those who were at the last supper included Jesus’s mother Mary, Mary Magdalene, Mary and Martha of Bethany, Peter’s wife, Salome the mother of James and John, the patrons Joanna and Susannah (Luke 8:3), Mary the mother of John Mark, her servant Rhoda, the woman healed of the twelve-year hemorrhage. Interestingly, she forgets Mary of Clopas, the main character in my novel, Forgotten Followers.


Were Women Present at the Last Supper?


While the Bible does not explicitly say women were present at the last supper, it does refer to women both before and after the last supper. It names women present throughout Jesus’s ministry, as patrons, as caring for his needs during his ministry, at his crucifixion, burial, and resurrection after the last supper. It specifically shows Jesus healing people regardless of gender or race and regardless of the Sabbath rest. He reached out to ensure women could study his teaching.

- Jesus healed both women and men, girls and boys: Matthew 4:24-25 Matthew 15:30 Mark 1:30-34 Mark 7:24-30 Luke 4:40 Matthew 9:21 Luke 8:40-56 Luke 13:10-17

- Jesus taught in fields and meadows where women and children could study: Matthew 14:14 Luke 9:11 Luke 18 John 6:2

- At the temple, Jesus taught in the Women’s Court, where women could study and learn from him: John 8

- Jesus commended women for their faith: Luke 7

- Jesus accepted ‘many women’ in the capacity of disciples supporting him financially: Luke 8:2-3

- Jesus said Mary of Bethany made the right choice to take the posture of a disciple and learn from him: Luke 10:42

- Encouraged women to be honoured more for hearing God’s word and following it than for being mothers: Luke 11:27-28

- Permitted Mary of Bethany to take the role of a prophet and anoint him as king: John 12:1-11

- ‘Many women’ came from Galilee to Jerusalem to care for his needs Matthew 27:55-56 Mark 15:40-41 Luke 23:49 John 19:25

- Women watched him buried Matthew 27:61

- Women went to the tomb to anoint Jesus’s body Matthew 28:1-10, Mark 16:9-20 Luke 24:1-10 John 20:1-18

- Women were among those given the great commission to teach his word (Matthew 28:29-20)


These women who were healed and became patrons, supporters, disciples and apostles faithfully followed Jesus and were at his last supper also. I hope this post shows how tradition and art have influenced our interpretation and perception of the last supper as a male-only event.


My novel, Forgotten Followers (from Broken to Bold) depicts women at the last supper. As Jesus washes their feet, he explains to them that unless he washes you, you cannot be one of his people (John 13:8). Jesus encouraged women and men to follow him, to be his people.


Just as we no longer believe the Bible says the sun revolves around the earth, many of us no longer believe the Bible says that only men were called as disciples. If we re-examine which beliefs come from tradition and images and which are biblical we may be surprised to find that Jesus calls people of all genders to hear his word and follow it, to teach and preach it, making disciples of all nations.



86 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All