Is Apostle Paul Misunderstood? (1)

I am reluctant to admit I didn't really like Apostle Paul, whose writings compose almost a quarter of the New Testament. I read his letters in the New Testament, and it looked like he was prejudiced against women, and he especially disliked strong, capable women. Is Apostle Paul misunderstood?

In my interview with Marg Mowczko, she said she loves Paul because when she reads his letters, she sees he had a wonderful vision for the community of God's people. Paul loved people, helped people of all classes and genders, made deep friendships with women and men, commended women as co-workers, and promoted unity within the body of believers.

Have I misunderstood Apostle Paul? This article is part 1 of a 4-part series on Paul.

Wikimedia Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Conversion_of_Saint_Paul_MET_DP318243.jpg

What was Paul's influence on the church?

Paul was central to the expansion of Christianity and a key figure in its growth. He dramatically converted from a persecutor to a promoter of Christianity and suffered imprisonment and persecution in his zeal to spread the good news of Jesus to the Gentiles. He travelled widely, planted many churches, and wrote letters to his friends and followers.

Paul wrote ten of the 27 books in the New Testament: Romans, 1 & 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 & 2 Thessalonians, and Philemon. Some scholars question the authenticity of Ephesians, Colossians, and 2 Thessalonians.

If you include 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus, letters where Paul's authorship is in doubt, then Paul wrote 23% of the New Testament.

Many of Paul's writings have been understood to limit women's freedoms and force women into silence and subjugation, making him an easy target for criticism. The 3rd-century theologian Tertullian called women "the devil's gateway." The playwright George Bernard Shaw suggested Paul was the "eternal enemy of woman." Paul's writing is influential. Since Paul's writings are a large part of the New Testament, we need to get this right.

What can we believe about Paul?

What do we do with passages that have been thrown in our faces, telling women that there are restrictions on what they can do? What can we do with Paul's uncomfortable messages? These passages are difficult to understand in the context of other passages about God's redeeming love. These passages seem to conflict with other passages where Paul commends female leaders in the early church movement and says that in Christ, our differences don't matter. How can we reconcile the apparent biblical support for patriarchy? I see four options:

1. Patriarchy is the result of sin: Paul's intent is to confirm male hierarchy as sin's impact on God's creation. The three persons of the Holy Trinity are equal in essence and authority. At creation, God gave men and women similar roles and responsibilities as God's representatives, co-creators in both being fruitful and stewards of the earth (Genesis 1:28). Husbands and wives submit to one another. The Fall resulted in men as rulers and women as subordinates. Only males can represent Christ in offering Holy Communion. The original equality will be restored when Christ returns. This is the historic church's position. Women prophesied, evangelized, taught and baptized in the 1st and 2nd centuries, but church creeds of the 4th and 5th centuries withdrew a woman's right to preach, teach, baptize, or officiate at communion. I outline restrictions based on gender declared at various historic Church Councils in my article: Deacons, Widows, and Churches Silencing Women.

2. Patriarchy is designed by God: Paul's intent is to promote a male hierarchy as a guide for living. The three persons of the Holy Trinity have equal value, but Jesus is eternally subordinate to the Father, providing an example of how wives are subordinate to husbands. God designed a hierarchy from the beginning, with men in authority and women in subordinate roles. From the beginning, humans had equal value, and at the same time, men held a higher rank or authority with fewer restrictions than women. This is the modern Complementarian view and places men as rulers at home, church, and society, both now and in the future. It can lead to believing Christians (or white Christians) are God's chosen people, entitled to wealth, power, and privilege and can exploit the earth for personal benefit. It may also lead to the idea that since God's grace saves us, no action or behaviour on our part is required. Any outreach focus is on the spiritual needs of others, and not their physical needs, such as providing food, shelter, or medical care. It could mean a focus on passages that appear to support male hierarchy while ignoring passages that show both Jesus and Paul working with women and commending them. This interpretation lends itself to power imbalances, sexism, abuse, slavery, and racism. I address these first two views in post 2 of 4: Is Paul a Misogynist?

   
   

3. The Bible opposes Patriarchy: Paul's intent is to oppose pagan hierarchy and promote equality and mutual dependence as a guide for living in a Christian community. Paul announces that Jesus broke the barriers dividing people. Paul's letters expand on the meaning of Jesus's death and resurrection and God's redeeming love. Paul promots mutual service. This option looks at the context of a passage and sees how it is consistent with other biblical passages. Starting with a focus on the commandment to love God and love one another, we can interpret Paul's letters differently. In context, these passages seem to flatten the hierarchy and give men and women equal freedoms and responsibilities. This option prioritizes passages about freedom, mutuality and love over passages that seem to support subordination. It understands Paul's letters through the lens of Jesus, the Gospels, and the Bible's story of God's redeeming love. The Bible consistently shows God's love for us and encourages us to love one another, serve one another, and build one another up. Where Paul seems to promote slavery or prejudice, we understand Paul was not writing to political leaders to change society; Paul was writing to individuals to change society one person at a time. Opponents to this option tend to say that those holding this viewpoint are not obeying the Bible. But maybe God did not allow unloving or inconsistent passages in the Bible. Maybe humans have misunderstood these passages. I address this in part 3 of 4: "Is Paul Misquoted?"

   
   

4. The Bible is Inconsistent: Paul endorses patriarchy while Jesus endorses mutual respect, service, and love. We hold in tension that Paul limits women's roles (1 Timothy) and that Paul commends women as co-workers (Romans 16) and mutuality in marriage (1 Corinthians 7). We believe in two opposing ideas: women are equal (in substance), and women are subordinate (in functions). Some see the hierarchies as a harmonious division of responsibilities, while others may feel restrained and devalued. Seeing the Bible as inconsistent may lead to: Rejecting the Bible as today's guide for living, or rejecting some portions as applicable only for a past audience. Bible writers were inspired by God but influenced by the culture and time in which they wrote and by their own male experience and frame of reference. The Bible reflects man's incomplete understanding of conflicts between God's justice and mercy, God's power and the world's suffering. Prioritizing passages that seem to teach male authority and leadership over passages about mutual love, service, and respect. The church has traditionally interpreted the passages on mutuality through an assumption of male authority, resulting in limitations based on gender. This option puts a priority on Paul's writing and interprets Jesus and the Gospels through the lens of a patriarchal understanding of Paul's writing. It means more preaching on Paul than on Jesus. The church has often followed a Pauline Christianity that is very different from Jesus and his teachings and example. That is the topic of post 4 of 4: Did the Church Misconstrue Paul's Writing?

I hope you enjoy a new, refreshing, and empowering way of seeing Paul and his writing in this series.

1. Is Paul Misunderstood (this article)

2. Is Paul a Misogynist?

3. Is Paul Misquoted?

4. Did the Church Misconstrue Paul's Writing? 

---

Elaine Ricker Kelly Author is empowering women with historical fiction about women in the Bible and early church and Christian blogs about women in leadership, church history and doctrine. Her books include:

• Forgotten Followers from Broken to Bold, Book 1, A Novel (2022)

• The Sword: A Fun Way to Engage in Healthy Debate on What the Bible Says About a Woman's Role (2023)

• Because She Was Called from Broken to Bold, Book 2, A Novel of the Early Church (2024)

• Walk with Mara on Her Healing Journey: 21 Steps to Emotional Resilience (2024)

• Finding Her Voice from Broken to Bold, Book 3, Acts of Early Female Apostles: A Novel (2025)